Anticipated Impacts of 2010-11 California Budget

Continued Furloughs, Layoffs or Both for California State Workers?

1 Comments
Join the Conversation
2010-11 Budget Expected to Have Cuts - Wikimedia Commons
2010-11 Budget Expected to Have Cuts - Wikimedia Commons
The 2010-2011 California State budget to be released Friday January 8, 2010, may include a combination of furloughs and layoffs as cost saving measures.

Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger's eagerly anticipated 2010-2011 budget proposal has left State workers on edge as 2010 begins. State worker furloughs, which took full effect in 2009, have had a devastating impact on many families in California, not just those working for the state. If the 2010-2011 budget continues the furloughs, or institutes layoffs, the impacts will be even farther reaching.

Furlough Rulings

In September 2009, a San Francisco Superior Court judge ruled that the furloughs were unlawful as applied to employees of the State Compensation Insurance Fund (SCIF). His ruling ended furloughs for more than 6,200 SCIF employees represented by Local 1000.

The end of 2009 was marked by an Alameda Superior Court ruling in favor of three unions, that the governor’s “emergency” executive orders, designed to help save the State money, were illegal. Judge Frank Roesch said Schwarzenegger's use of furloughs was "an abuse of discretion" and that he had ignored legal restrictions on furloughs, interfered with operations of state agencies and achieved questionable savings.

While the judge ordered the governor to "cease and desist" the furlough of employees whose salaries are paid from special funds, the ultimate implementation of the decision remains uncertain. An official court decision is expected by mid to late January, and the Governor is likely to appeal these rulings. An appeal process could leave the furlough matter tied up in courts well into 2010. So what does this all mean for California State workers in 2010?

Extension of Furloughs and Layoffs

An extended period of furloughs for state workers would mean a continued beating of California's economy, and a sluggish start to the recovery that was hoped for in 2010. An extension of the furloughs or an increase to 4 furlough days per month would not only increase foreclosures as families lose their homes, it will make families who rent choose between a roof over their head and being able to afford groceries and health care premiums. Layoffs after an extended period of furloughs would be a harsh both emotionally and financially.

The Nation's Furlough Situation for 2010

According to Stateline's June 2009 story, California is one of 21 states whose employees are dealing with furloughs. Even if the economy begins recovery in 2010, state budgets will likely not stabilize until years later. Here are some of the top stories from around the nation:

What Can California Expect in 2010?

If the state of the State address on January 6, 2010 was any indication, the following general topics will be front and center in the 2010-11 Budget:

  • Additional cuts to handle projected decline in revenues thru 2013-2014
  • Investment in water resources
  • Protection of education funding
  • Reducing prison spending
  • Pursuing equitable share of federal funding for California
  • Pension reform

No doubt Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger's budget proposal for 2010-11 will have tough cuts. It remains to be seen how furloughs and layoffs will play out and how State workers will manage through the crisis.

Photo of Jule Rizzardo, Jule Rizzardo

Jule Rizzardo - Jule Rizzardo is a freelance writer, specializing in small business advertising and management skill development.

rss
Advertisement
Leave a comment

NOTE: Because you are not a Suite101 member, your comment will be moderated before it is viewable.
Submit
What is 6+0?

Comments

Jan 11, 2010 4:10 PM
Guest :
Its really odd.

The State of CA is still in a wrestling match with a special panel of three FEDERAL Judges sitting in San Francisco (part of 9th Circuit) who have lawful control of the California Prison System medical programs. The Feds have the final say on spending for that portion of the prison system. AND.... they are demanding spending to update the State's medical care for prisoners.

Let me repeat. The Gov's budget does NOT mention that wild card. The Feds can demand MORE spending and the State has to comply.

So, the budget as presented to the public is untruthful by omission. It does not take into account a probable expenditure of ONE BILLION dollars for building a NEW prison starting in 2010. That was one option that the State proposed. Yet its not mentioned in the media.

What is with that? Partial news coverage... without any questions about the wild card Federal Control.
1
Advertisement
Advertisement